See our Journal Articles guide to learn more about finding articles for your research.
Use the chart below to help you distinguish between scholarly journal articles and popular magazines.
|
SCHOLARLY JOURNALS |
MAGAZINES |
NOTES |
Includes notes and/or bibliography |
Few references or no bibliography |
AUDIENCE |
Written for experts, shows research |
Written for average reader |
PAGE LENGTH |
Usually more than 5 pages |
Often less than 5 pages |
ADS |
Few or none; if any, advertising books and other "scholarly" items |
Many, often in color |
LOOK |
Mostly text and charts |
Glossy, many pictures often in color |
LOCATION |
Usually only available through a library (often via a library's website) |
Title can be found at newsstand or through a bookstore |
EXAMPLE TITLES |
|
Newsweek, Maxim, Time, Good Housekeeping |
See also our Differences Between Scholarly Journals & Popular Magazines guide (PDF format).
What is a “peer-reviewed” journal?
Common elements of a scholarly or “peer-reviewed” journal article
Abstract – What is this article about? The abstract is a concise summary.
Introduction – What is the key problem, issue, or question?
Method – How will the author investigate the problem? With a laboratory test? Or a survey? Or another type of study?
Results – Research findings, including observations, statistics, graphs, etc.
Discussion / Conclusion – What did the author learn? What did the study prove? What questions are still unanswered?
References – What other scholarly articles did the author consult when conducting this research and writing this article?
You can search MavScholar to find and request articles from other libraries. See our Get Articles from Other Libraries guide for detailed instructions.
If you are using Google Scholar off campus, change your settings to link to our library holdings.
Scholarly Publications | Substantive/Trade Publications | Popular Publications | Sensationalist Publications | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Audience | Academics, professors, students. | Educated audiences, practitioners. | General public. | Gullible audiences. |
Author | Scholars, experts, and specialists; credentials are listed. | Credentialed journalists; professionals and industry experts; credentials are usually listed. | Professional writers: journalists, staff, freelance writers; not necessarily experts in the field; authors and/or credentials not always listed. | Anyone. |
Publisher | Academic presses and professional organizations. | Nationally and internationally recognized organizations. | Commercial businesses. | Varies. Ranges from individuals to politically-minded groups to hate groups. |
Purpose | Report on scholarship and research. | Share news and trends with industry professionals. | Information and/or entertainment. | Cater to superstitions; elicit emotions and strong feelings for or against a particular topic. |
Tone | Factual, technical, and scholarly language. | Formal, technical language. Often uses industry jargon. | Relatively simple language. | Sensational terms. Propaganda. Often uses inflammatory or derogatory language. |
Appearance | Usually plain. May have tables, graphs, charts, and formulas. If photographs are present, they are directly associated with the topic. | Tables, charts, graphs, and images related to the article. More graphic design elements than scholarly publications. | Eye-catching and colorful. | Eye-catching and colorful; sometimes newspaper-like. Often only available online. |
Advertisements | Limited to advertisements for books and journals. | Most often limited to advertisements for items directly related to the publication or trade; some paid advertisements. | Paid advertisements. | Paid advertisements, often making their own sensationalist claims. Clickbait. |
Review Process | Reviewed by scholars. All data and interpretations of data are checked. | Reviewed by professional editors employed by the publication. Facts are checked. | Reviewed by professional editors employed by the publication. Facts might be checked. | No apparent or consistent review process. |
Sources | Always contains a bibliography, works cited, or references. | Often contains in-text citations. May contain references list. | Rarely identifies sources. | Rarely identifies sources. If sources are listed, they may not actually be reliable sources of information. |
Examples | Academy of Management Review; Journal of Popular Culture; ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering | The Atlantic Monthly; Economist; AdWeek; Government reports and data-sets. | Time; Women's Health; Pride; Life Magazine | Federalist Tribune; Occupy Democrats; National Enquirer |
Check out the information below to better understand different types of sources.
Scholarly Publications | Substantive/Trade Publications | Popular Publications | Sensationalist Publications | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Audience | Academics, professors, students. | Educated audiences, practitioners. | General public. | Gullible audiences. |
Author | Scholars, experts, and specialists; credentials are listed. | Credentialed journalists; professionals and industry experts; credentials are usually listed. | Professional writers: journalists, staff, freelance writers; not necessarily experts in the field; authors and/or credentials not always listed. | Anyone. |
Publisher | Academic presses and professional organizations. | Nationally and internationally recognized organizations. | Commercial businesses. | Varies. Ranges from individuals to politically-minded groups to hate groups. |
Purpose | Report on scholarship and research. | Share news and trends with industry professionals. | Information and/or entertainment. | Cater to superstitions; elicit emotions and strong feelings for or against a particular topic. |
Tone | Factual, technical, and scholarly language. | Formal, technical language. Often uses industry jargon. | Relatively simple language. | Sensational terms. Propaganda. Often uses inflammatory or derogatory language. |
Appearance | Usually plain. May have tables, graphs, charts, and formulas. If photographs are present, they are directly associated with the topic. | Tables, charts, graphs, and images related to the article. More graphic design elements than scholarly publications. | Eye-catching and colorful. | Eye-catching and colorful; sometimes newspaper-like. Often only available online. |
Advertisements | Limited to advertisements for books and journals. | Most often limited to advertisements for items directly related to the publication or trade; some paid advertisements. | Paid advertisements. | Paid advertisements, often making their own sensationalist claims. Clickbait. |
Review Process | Reviewed by scholars. All data and interpretations of data are checked. | Reviewed by professional editors employed by the publication. Facts are checked. | Reviewed by professional editors employed by the publication. Facts might be checked. | No apparent or consistent review process. |
Sources | Always contains a bibliography, works cited, or references. | Often contains in-text citations. May contain references list. | Rarely identifies sources. | Rarely identifies sources. If sources are listed, they may not actually be reliable sources of information. |
Examples | Academy of Management Review; Journal of Popular Culture; ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering | The Atlantic Monthly: Economist; AdWeek; Government reports and data sets. | Time; Women's Health; Pride; Life Magazine | Federalist Tribune; Occupy Democrats; National Enquirer |
List of journals available (both print and electronic) from Memorial Library. This link is most useful when you have a citation for a journal and would like to see if we own it.
Listed below are three ways to determine whether a journal is peer reviewed:
Look under the title for Peer Reviewed to indicate if the journal uses the peer review process.
Use the following link to search for the journal title in Ulrich’s Periodical Directory. If you see this icon then the journal is refereed (same thing as peer reviewed).
Search for the journal title on the web. Look for an editorial policy page or a page for authors to find out if the journal uses a peer review process.