There were no questions at the end of Session 2.
After the Session, I realized my logic for counting items in the Pivot Chart section was wrong. Instead of counting titles, I should have counted barcodes. This is because there can be duplicate titles. Duplicate titles would be counted as 1 title. To count items, I should have used a unique value. The barcode would have been a better choice. See 45:40 in the video.
After Session 2, during office hours, one person followed up on conditional formatting. For Project 2, we saw how to highlight single cells if they met a condition. But what if we want to highlight the entire row if a single cell meets a condition? I didn't know how to do this, so we learned together by reference to this Youtube video.
During Session 3, I will ask if anyone wants to see anything in particular in the final session. I may not be able to address these ideas in Session 4, but I'd like to try to finish the series as helpfully as possible.
There was a follow-up question: "What’s the difference between [SCImago] and Scopus?"
My brief answer:
SCImago is based on Scopus data. SCImago is a research project centered at a University in Granada, Spain. I personally don’t have access to Scopus data so I can’t compare the two. (I work for a regional, public, comprehensive university, so our budget is focused on curricular resources.) That said, I like SCImago data very much because it’s free (😊), it provides a “universe” of journals with any citation impact, and I think the subject data is enormously helpful. It allows us to tune our reports to answer the needs of specific depts and programs.
The website itself might provide better information: https://www.scimagojr.com/aboutus.php.
A couple of years ago, I wrote a brief overview of several free tools for our Collection Analysis libguide. I’m afraid I haven’t had time recently to review it for revisions, but it could possibly be helpful: https://libguides.mnsu.edu/c.php?g=1287205&p=9451843.
We'll focus on data matching for this session, so a better title might be, "Project 4: Data Matching for Collection Analysis." Instead of completing a report providing an overview of how journals and journal packages are used across the university, by subject, we will try a different report. During Session 3, there was interest in how to summarize Alma ER Holdings coverage data, so we'll work with holdings data. During Session 4, I won't have time to demonstrate how I summarize holdings data, but if there is interest, following this demonstration of how one might use such data, then I could offer a standalone session to show only how to prepare Alma ER Holdings data for summarization.